Presentation-Powerpoint


 * ** Category ** || ** 1-Poor ** || ** 2-Fair ** || ** 3-Good ** || ** 4-Excellent ** ||
 * ** Number of slides ** || 5 slides or less || 6-7 slides || 8-9 slides || 10 slides or more ||
 * ** Number of pictures ** || 0 pictures || 1-2 pictures || 3-4 pictures || 5 pictures or more ||
 * ** Presentation of Research ** || No research evident or present in Powerpoint || Research present, but clearly plagiarized || Research present, but a mixture of original wording and plagiarism || Research present, all content and wording is original ||
 * ** Quality of Research ** || Names or phrases with no detail or explanation || Simple phrases with little detail or explanation || Some detail, but missing in other slides (inconsistent) || Research is detailed, on-topic, and clearly relates to current slide ||
 * ** Presentation ** || Reading directly from slides, no additional detail, not facing audience || Mostly reading slides, facing audience, lacks interest in presentation || Some reading from slides, some expansion upon slides, tepid interest || Not reading directly from slides, expanding upon slides from memory, eye contact with audience ||
 * ** Total grade ** || ** 5-8 points: D ** || ** 9-12 points: C ** || ** 13-16 points: B ** || ** 17-20 points: A ** ||

An example of a student Powerpoint that meets our expectations: