Presentation-News+Broadcast


 * ** Category ** || ** 1-Poor ** || ** 2-Fair ** || ** 3-Good ** || ** 4-Excellent ** ||
 * ** Slides/Audio ** || No slides, unclear audio || Slides but weak connection to story, inarticulate audio || Slides with solid connection to story, inarticulate audio || Slides with solid connection to story, articulate audio ||
 * ** Number of Stories ** || 2 or less stories || 3 stories || 4 stories || 5 or more stories ||
 * ** Presentation of Research ** || No research evident or present in stories || Research present, but clearly plagiarized || Research present, but a mixture of original wording and plagiarism || Research present, all content and wording is original ||
 * ** Quality of Research ** || Names or phrases with no detail or explanation || Simple phrases with little detail or explanation || Some detail, but missing in other stories (inconsistent) || Research is detailed, on-topic, and clearly relates to current story ||
 * ** Presentation ** || Reading directly from notes, no additional detail, no eye contact with audience || Mostly reading from notes, facing audience, lacks interest in presentation || Some reading from notes, tepid interest, eye contact is inconsistent || Not reading directly from notes, consistent eye contact with audience ||
 * ** Total grade ** || **5-8 points: D** || **9-12 points: C** || **13-16 points: B** || **17-20 points: A** ||